iFANN
    ابحث في iFANN...
    تسجيل الدخول
    الرئيسية
    الأخبار
    فيديوهات
    صور
    صور GIF
    استكشاف
    استطلاعات
    الجوائز
    iFAMOUS
    ويكي
    أنمي
    غرف
    الإشعارات
    الرسائل
    المحفوظات
    الملف الشخصي
    ويكيالجوائزiFAMOUSالتصنيفاتالقطاعاتمكافآت المبدعينمكافآت المستخدمينالشروطالخصوصيةإرشادات المجتمعالإزالة / DMCAالمساعدةالمطورون

    © 2026 iFANN

    الرئيسية
    بحث
    الرسائل
    التنبيهات
    الملف الشخصي
    صورة
    Estebankiwi
    Estebankiwi@estebankiwi3mo
    📱GPT💭AI💭Tech
    Claude Fable 5 DeepSWE benchmark

    @estebankiwiClaude Fable 5 has claimed the top spot on DeepSWE with a score of 70%. However, the performance gap between Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 is far more significant than just three percentage points. Fable 5 generates code that reads as if it were written by a senior engineer, while GPT 5.5 produces code that simply passes the tests. Both models deliver functional software, but only one delivers software that truly impresses.

    عرض المنشور الأصلي

    Claude Fable 5 DeepSWE benchmark

    صورة بواسطة @estebankiwi· Jun 19, 2026· GPT

    عن هذه الصورة

    The image shows a horizontal bar chart comparing AI models. The focus is on a table with model names, performance metrics, and bars representing their performance. The model "claude-fable-5" is highlighted with a red rectangle around it and its corresponding bar is orange. The table columns are labeled "MODEL", "PASS@1", "AVG COST", "OUT TOK", and "STEPS". The model names listed are claude-fable-5, gpt-5.5, claude-opus-4.8, gpt-5.4, gemini-3.5-flash, and kimi-k2.7-code. No on-screen text stands out aside from the column headers and model names.

    عرض كل صور GPTاقرأ ويكي GPT

    ?

    المزيد من صور GPT

    عرض كل صور GPT
    AI as your doctor?AI as your doctor?GPT 6 Astra effort comparison tableGPT 6 Astra effort comparison tablemanual coding psychopathmanual coding psychopathJensen Huang AGI has arrived GPT-6 Astra2Jensen Huang AGI has arrived GPT-6 AstraAI Breakfast greatest predictionAI Breakfast greatest predictionweekend plans cancelledweekend plans cancelledAI Image Models ComparisonAI Image Models Comparison
    صورة
    Estebankiwi
    Estebankiwi@estebankiwi3mo
    📱GPT💭AI💭Tech
    Claude Fable 5 DeepSWE benchmark

    @estebankiwiClaude Fable 5 has claimed the top spot on DeepSWE with a score of 70%. However, the performance gap between Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 is far more significant than just three percentage points. Fable 5 generates code that reads as if it were written by a senior engineer, while GPT 5.5 produces code that simply passes the tests. Both models deliver functional software, but only one delivers software that truly impresses.

    عرض المنشور الأصلي

    Claude Fable 5 DeepSWE benchmark

    صورة بواسطة @estebankiwi· Jun 19, 2026· GPT

    عن هذه الصورة

    The image shows a horizontal bar chart comparing AI models. The focus is on a table with model names, performance metrics, and bars representing their performance. The model "claude-fable-5" is highlighted with a red rectangle around it and its corresponding bar is orange. The table columns are labeled "MODEL", "PASS@1", "AVG COST", "OUT TOK", and "STEPS". The model names listed are claude-fable-5, gpt-5.5, claude-opus-4.8, gpt-5.4, gemini-3.5-flash, and kimi-k2.7-code. No on-screen text stands out aside from the column headers and model names.

    عرض كل صور GPTاقرأ ويكي GPT

    ?

    المزيد من صور GPT

    عرض كل صور GPT
    AI as your doctor?AI as your doctor?GPT 6 Astra effort comparison tableGPT 6 Astra effort comparison tablemanual coding psychopathmanual coding psychopathJensen Huang AGI has arrived GPT-6 Astra2Jensen Huang AGI has arrived GPT-6 AstraAI Breakfast greatest predictionAI Breakfast greatest predictionweekend plans cancelledweekend plans cancelledAI Image Models ComparisonAI Image Models Comparison