iFANN
    ابحث في iFANN...
    تسجيل الدخول
    الرئيسية
    الأخبار
    فيديوهات
    صور
    صور GIF
    استكشاف
    استطلاعات
    الجوائز
    iFAMOUS
    ويكي
    أنمي
    غرف
    الإشعارات
    الرسائل
    المحفوظات
    الملف الشخصي
    ويكيالجوائزiFAMOUSالتصنيفاتالقطاعاتمكافآت المبدعينمكافآت المستخدمينالشروطالخصوصيةإرشادات المجتمعالإزالة / DMCAالمساعدةالمطورون

    © 2026 iFANN

    الرئيسية
    بحث
    الرسائل
    التنبيهات
    الملف الشخصي

    منشور

    Vojtech
    Vojtech@vojtech
    🏢Microsoft🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology📱Kimi K3

    Loop vs graph agents explained

    Your agent keeps forgetting everything between runs, and that's the real bottleneck. A loop-based setup gives the agent a goal and lets it figure things out, which works for fresh problems but falls apart when you repeat the same task. A graph instead structures the work as connected facts the agent moves through, so knowledge builds up instead of resetting to zero. It's more effort upfront, but you never start from nothing again. The loop forgets, the graph accumulates. That's the actual unlock: organize what you know as relationships rather than loose files, and a smaller model moving through a clean graph beats a bigger one searching through raw text. Microsoft, Stanford, and MIT all confirmed this independently. Kimi K3 fits the role: a million tokens of context can handle an entire reasoning path at once, at a third of the cost of frontier models. When a loop stops teaching you anything new, freeze it into a graph. So which one is your stack actually running?

    3w

    0 إعجابات0 عدم إعجاب0 إعادات نشر0 التعليقات
    ?

    التعليقات

    لا توجد تعليقات بعد. كن أول من يعلّق!

    منشور

    Vojtech
    Vojtech@vojtech
    🏢Microsoft🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology📱Kimi K3

    Loop vs graph agents explained

    Your agent keeps forgetting everything between runs, and that's the real bottleneck. A loop-based setup gives the agent a goal and lets it figure things out, which works for fresh problems but falls apart when you repeat the same task. A graph instead structures the work as connected facts the agent moves through, so knowledge builds up instead of resetting to zero. It's more effort upfront, but you never start from nothing again. The loop forgets, the graph accumulates. That's the actual unlock: organize what you know as relationships rather than loose files, and a smaller model moving through a clean graph beats a bigger one searching through raw text. Microsoft, Stanford, and MIT all confirmed this independently. Kimi K3 fits the role: a million tokens of context can handle an entire reasoning path at once, at a third of the cost of frontier models. When a loop stops teaching you anything new, freeze it into a graph. So which one is your stack actually running?

    3w

    0 إعجابات0 عدم إعجاب0 إعادات نشر0 التعليقات
    ?

    التعليقات

    لا توجد تعليقات بعد. كن أول من يعلّق!